|
Socialist Action / July
1998
On the UAW Picket Line in Flint: 'This is a War with
General Motors for Job Security'
By Mark Harris
FLINT, Mich. -- When you drive into Flint, Michigan, on
Interstate 69, the first notice of the town's unique history
comes when you see the signs for "UAW Freeway," as the
stretch of interchange that wraps around the town is called.
I was looking for the General Motors (GM) plants where
locals 659 and 651 were on strike, but having no idea
exactly where I was, I decided to take the first exit and
just drive a bit until I found my bearings. It didn't take
long.
As luck would have it, a right turn down the first major
intersection led me straight toward the huge GM metal
fabrication plant where on June 5 some 3400 workers walked
off the job, sparking what has come to be a virtual shutdown
of the world's largest automaker.
The plant includes GM's bus and truck operations and is
unquestionably the largest factory I have ever seen. Right
across the street sits the much more modest facility of
Local 659. But the union local's unassuming appearance
belies its momentous history, as the permanent sign on the
marquee outside the building, "Home of the 1937
Sit-Downers," is quick to remind you.
Here it was 61 years ago that workers put down their
tools and occupied the GM factories for 44 days. Their
action led to the first union contract in the auto industry
and sparked the mass unionization of industrial workers
throughout North America. And despite the setbacks of recent
years, Flint remains very much a union town.
As I drove through town, I saw UAW flags attached to the
roofs of cars the way people in towns might otherwise
advertise their allegiance to the local college football
team. The sign out front of the Days Inn motel, where I
stayed, proclaimed, "We support UAW Locals 659 and 651."
Nearby, a 40-foot balloon of a gorilla donated by a local
company sat, holding a sign that says, "Don't Monkey with
the UAW."
Talking with strikers on the picket line takes place
against a backdrop of constantly blasting car horns, as
passing motorists proclaim their solidarity, and I worry
about whether my tape recorder will pick up the
conversations I'm having.
The local paper reported residents near the Delphi East
parts plant were complaining it had been days since they'd
gotten a good night's sleep because of the round-the-clock
honking. But, for the most part, even the sleep- deprived
were only anti-noise, not anti-union.
The 3400 UAW members striking the metal-stamping plant,
along with their 5800 brothers and sisters at GM's Delphi
plant on the other side of town, hope through their action
to send a message to GM: Keep our jobs here. Period.
GM says global competition demands new manufacturing
standards. But what, as many on the picket lines will tell
you, does competitiveness mean if it leads to lost jobs,
economic insecurity, and decimated communities?
Unlike in 1970 when the UAW struck the automaker for 67
days, the 223,000 workers who now work for GM constitute
less than half the number working back then. In Flint,
44,000 jobs have been lost -- and it shows.
Drive around for a while and it's not hard to find
neighborhoods with a look of bygone prosperity. Residential
neighborhoods of single-family homes, at one time
undoubtedly symbols of a thriving local economy, now show
tell-tale signs of family economies stretched to the limit.
Much of Flint looks poor.
Enough of broken promises
The mood on the picket line two weeks into the strike is
upbeat but not unrealistic. The strikers know they face a
tough and maybe prolonged battle, but there is the sense
that more caving in to GM's insatiable concessionary
appetite will only lead to more misery.
The gate captain at one picket site told me that when the
decision was made to strike, there was a kind of pervasive
relief in the air, as if at last the truth about how things
are would now no longer be downplayed or denied.
"GM's claim that they are committed to investing in their
American operations is belied by their actions," says UAW
Vice President Richard Shoemaker, a view endorsed by almost
every person I spoke with.
"They continually threaten our locals with being sold or
outsourced out of existence. They make commitments to invest
and, as in the case of Local 659, they renege on these
commitments in lieu of new demands that were not part of
their original commitments. The end result is the same;
America and communities like Flint come last in their
strategy."
One picket, an older African American man whom I spoke
with and who told me he had worked in the plant for 41
years, seemed to capture the thinking of most of those on
the line.
"In my opinion, GM is basically looking for cheap labor,"
he said. "They're taking our work to these Third World
countries like Mexico, China, or Indonesia and paying people
practically nothing. We're out here because we want good
jobs, good jobs for those coming along, and I mean jobs that
will last more than a couple of years."
He asked me if I knew that the top five executives at GM
made $21 million in bonuses last year. "This has nothing to
do with their stock options or salaries, that's just the
bonuses they paid themselves. Now, that's a lot of waste, in
my opinion. Really, I think they would be pleased, more than
anything, if we just went back to work for $4 an hour. Then
they'd be happy."
As we talked, another striker stood by, listening
quietly. "You know, in this plant here, we give them all
that they want," he finally interjected. "These are quality
parts, too. To make the quotas they set, people are working
through lunch, breaks; I mean, you really put out when you
work here.
"Even though they're making a certain percentage, they're
getting the quotas they want, they're meeting their goals
and they're making a profit, it doesn't seem to matter. They
only want more and more. There's just no end to it."
"This is a war for job security"
I traveled down a half a mile or so to the other picket
site at the stamping plant. I introduced myself to a younger
worker, one of a sizeable number of African American
strikers. When I asked him what he thought the public should
know about the situation at GM, he echoed the earlier
comment about the hypocrisy of top executives paying
themselves multi-million-dollar bonuses while preaching hard
times to employees.
"They're competitive, all right," he laughed, "at least
when it comes to paying themselves. In my opinion, and a lot
of other people's opinions, this is a war with General
Motors for job security down the road."
As many workers will also tell you, GM has been sending a
message of faltering loyalty to Flint for some time.
Recently, the company began without fanfare to remove some
dies from the stamping plant, claiming they were scheduled
for repair when they were in fact being shipped to other
plants.
"You can't sit there and talk about bargaining in good
faith, and in the same breath, take dies out of the plant,
as they've been doing," one woman told me on the picket
line. "I mean, that was just wrong, and I think it shows
that they weren't willing to bargain in good faith. I'd like
to know why we should trust them?
"The bottom line is there is just no sense of security,"
added this eight-year GM veteran, her young daughter leaning
against her as we talked. "I've been laid off three times,
and the last time we lost our pick-up truck. It's hard, you
know, when you have a family."
Last year, GM had promised to spend $300 million on new
technology at the stamping plant. Instead, the company
stopped the upgrade at $120 million, citing their sudden
unhappiness with the "excess" overtime they're paying, based
on a quota system that compensates workers for each part
they make.
GM says the quota system and the resulting overtime pay
was a major factor in its claim of a $50 million loss last
year at the plant. But, as one worker told the Detroit Free
Press, "GM says it is losing $50 million. What that means is
if GM could outsource the cradle business to an outside
supplier, GM could make an additional $50 million in
profits."
Currently, GM plans to close the Buick City large-car
assembly plant in 1999. Much of the Delphi Flint East plant,
which includes the AC Sparkplug business, is also for sale.
GM's intent, according to some reports, is to construct a
new plant in Mexico modeled on its Brazilian factory.
The UAW predicts GM is also likely to close its small-car
assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio. For Flint residents,
another 11,000 jobs could be lost in coming years.
The global economy: a flailing club
There are no shortage of observers in the big-business
media ready to argue that the UAW has no choice but to face
the new rules of the global economy and all they entail.
"The UAW's leaders have held on to their offices despite
avoiding the duty of all responsible leaders: delivering and
explaining bad news to constituents," says Doron Levin, a
writer for The Detroit News and Free Press (June 20, 1998).
According to Levin, GM's current predicament is actually
caused by their failure not to make more cuts earlier. GM
must become a smaller company. The global economy demands
it.
Levin bears this news as if he is only a detached and
clear-eyed witness to a hard but objective reality. But his
real bias leaks out when he adds that GM would be
"negligent" to direct more of its capital into Flint, where
workers appear to "loathe" the company that has taken care
of so many of them for so long.
In other words, it would be a better world if GM just had
what it deserves, a quiescent, forever grateful, and
low-paid workforce. And if the UAW gets uppity and demands
all sorts of outrageous perks, like job security and an
actual future, then all the more reason to go where workers
are more likely to know their (humble) place.
Jim Hightower, the former Texas commissioner of
agriculture, remarks in his book, "There's Nothing in the
Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos"
(HarperCollins, 1997), that German factory workers are paid
on average $6.50 an hour more than American workers, and
they work 348 hours less a year. Hightower asks a good
question: Why don't we compete with that?
In a sense, that is what this strike is asking: Why can't
we make an economy that equates productivity with prosperity
for workers and their communities? GM talks ad nauseam about
the revved-up demands of global competition. The autoworkers
ask: Competitive for who?
A vision of economic success skewed by class inequity and
vanished dreams, dependent on slave wages in poor countries,
is no vision at all. GM's strategy of downsizing and
outsourcing may further enrich a few top-level investors and
executives, but for the people of Flint it translates into a
more abbreviated version of the American dream -- down and
out in Middle America.
The ranks of the UAW think they can do better. Their
strike is a stand for the brighter future their hard work
should be creating. It is a stand for economic justice, as
anyone who takes the time to talk to the strikers will
learn. "I've worked for GM for 32 years," said one picket as
we talked under the shade of a tree. "I could retire right
now. But I want to tell you, I'm going to stay out here if
it takes 90 days or six months. Whatever it takes, I'm
ready."
|